🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Regarding System and Philosophy

For example, it was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Directors Over Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to decide the tactics by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach only to dismiss him for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later discard him for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.